What changes an investor's decision
In technical due diligence, a finding changes the decision only if it threatens the business plan. That means the product cannot scale to the forecast, customer data is exposed, the company does not control its own code, or one person holds knowledge nobody else has. Everything else is normal engineering debt with a price tag.
That distinction is the main value of an outside reviewer. People inside a company get used to the risks they live with every day, and reviewers without startup experience can overrate anything unfamiliar. A good review names the few issues that matter and estimates what fixing them costs. It also says whether they should change the valuation, the terms, the use of funds or nothing at all. Investors get a clear basis for the deal. Founders get a fair hearing, because every issue is put in proportion instead of sitting in a long, unranked list.

